Re: Path to 0.92.1

["Carlos R. Mafra" <crmafra (at) gmail (dot) com>]

Dan Pascu wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2008, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
>> Dan Pascu wrote:
>>> On Saturday 01 November 2008, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>>>> John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
>>>>> Since there have been no complaints, I have committed the patches
>>>>> from the patch set I posted a few days ago. I have also bumped up
>>>>> the version number to 0.92.1pre.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would be very grateful if people would download and test.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://hg.windowmaker.info/wmaker/archive/wm_0_92.tar.bz2
>>>> It looks like we may need to bump up our dependent version of
>>>> automake:
>>>>
>>>> automake-1.7 is clean
>>> I made it work with 1.7 a long time ago. You can consider 1.7 to be
>>> the standard supported version.
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> What do you think about that patch I sent to address the warnings for
>>> = 1.8 ?
>> Do you think it is worth having it even if the 1.7 will be the
>> standard?
>>
>> I think a lot of people on recent distros will see those warnings, and
>> it would be good to not have the warnings, right?
> 
> I'm no longer actively involved in windowmaker development and I do not 
> review patches and work done by others. I only stated what I did so 
> people know where they stand and how to proceed from there.

Ok, I am sorry then!



-- 
To unsubscribe, send mail to wmaker-dev-unsubscribe@lists.windowmaker.info.